Automatic Abstractive Summarization Task for New Article
Abstract
Understanding the contents of numerous documents requires strenuous effort. While manually reading the summary or abstract is one way, automatic summarization offers more efficient way in doing so. The current research in automatic summarization focuses on the statistical method and the Natural Processing Language (NLP) method. Statistical method produce Extractive summary that the summaries consist of independent sentences considered important content of document. Unfortunately, the coherence of the summary is poor. Besides that, the Natural Processing Language expected can produces summary where sentences in summary should not be taken from sentences in the document, but come from the person making the summary. So, the summaries closed to human-summary, coherent and well structured. This study discusses the tasks of generating summary. The conclusion is we can find that there are still opportunities to develop better outcomes that are better coherence and better accuracy.
Downloads
References
Luhn, H.P. (1958). The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 

PE Genest, G Lapalme. (2011), Framework for Abstractive Summarization using text-to-text generation. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 64–73, Portland, Oregon, 24 June 2011. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
Madanapalli, Andhra Pradesh, (2008), Knowledge Extraction Using Rule Based Decision Tree Approach. International Journal of Computer Scienceand Network Security IJCSNS, VOL.8 No.7, India.
Trevor Cohn and Mirella Lapata, (2008), Sentence Compression Beyond Word Deletion Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling), pages 137–144 Manchester.
S. M. Harabagiu and F. Lacatusu, [2002], Generating single and multi-document summaries with gistexter," in Document Understanding Conferences (MUC)
R. Barzilay et al, [2003] ("Information fusion in 
the context of multi-document summarization," in Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, 1999, pp. 550- 557)
Jing, H., & McKeown, K. R. (2000). Cut and paste based text summarization. In Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference (pp. 178-185). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Hideki Tanaka, Akinori Kinoshita, Takeshi Kobayakawa, Tadashi Kumano, and Naoto Kato. (2009). Syntax- driven sentence revision for broadcast news summa- rization. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Lan- guage Generation and Summarisation, UCNLG+Sum ’09, pages 39–47, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Masayu Leylia Khodra, Dwi Hendratmo Widyantoro, E. Aminudin Aziz Bambang Riyanto Trilaksono, (2012), Automatic Tailored Multi Rhetorical Document Profile and Summary Specification, Journal of ICT Research and Applications. Published by ITB Journal Publisher, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2012, pp 220-239, ISSN: 1978-3086, DOI: 10.5614.
Afrida Helen, Ayu Purwarianti, Dwi Hendratmo Widyantoro (2014), Extraction and Classification of rhetorical sentences of experimental technical paper based on section class, 2nd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), 2014, Date of Conference: 28-30 May 2014, IEEE Xplore: DOI: 10.1109/ICoICT.2014.6914099
Afrida Helen, Ayu Purwarianti, Dwi Hendratmo Widyantoro, (2015), Rhetorical Sentences Classification Based on Section Class and Title of Paper for Experimental Technical Papers, Journal of ICT Research and Applications. Published by ITB Journal Publisher, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2015, pp. 288-310, ISSN: 2337-5787, DOI: 10.5614/
Copyright (c) 2018 EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya(PENS) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to PENS. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. The copyright transfer form can be downloaded here .
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
- Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
- Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the work or derivative works for the author’s personal use or company use, provided that the source and the copyright notice of Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya (PENS) publisher are indicated.
- Authors are allowed to use and reuse their articles under the same CC-BY-NC-SA license as third parties.
- Third-parties are allowed to share and adapt the publication work for all non-commercial purposes and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute under the same license as the original.
Plagiarism Check
To avoid plagiarism activities, the manuscript will be checked twice by the Editorial Board of the EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology (EMITTER Journal) using iThenticate Plagiarism Checker and the CrossCheck plagiarism screening service. The similarity score of a manuscript has should be less than 25%. The manuscript that plagiarizes another author’s work or author's own will be rejected by EMITTER Journal.
Authors are expected to comply with EMITTER Journal's plagiarism rules by downloading and signing the plagiarism declaration form here and resubmitting the form, along with the copyright transfer form via online submission.
